

-- ml
tags: cats, Dum Luks Community
Granted that there at least two main types of censorship. One is loud censorship to set an example. Here is where the boundary is. Don't cross it. Kill the chickens to scare the rhetorically inclined monkeys. A second type is the quiet, subtle censorship that influences ideas in the public domain that you never here about. This is the informal guidance to editors that is never revealed, the changes to school curricula to ensure contentious ideas are removed, and the stories and books that never make to the public in the first place and that thus don't have to be noisily suppressed later.What we can't know is already overwhelming.
Economists are trained to type in the assumptions that will maximize the career-utility of their results.
Dum Luk's Central: Where it all began one not so dark afternoon.Bush leveraged a national tragedy into reelection. He’s seeded the federal government with true believers, expanded executive authority while marginalizing Congress and appointing 2 radically conservative SC judges. He’s expanded government surveillance of our phones, e-mails, libraary borrowings, bank accounts and medicine cabinets. He’s stalled efforts to curb global warming, cut protections once provided by the EPA, FDA, and silenced scientists who dare refute the literal word of bible or the backward beliefs of those who claim to know the mind of the almighty. The US can now torture, imprision without providing cause and prosecute without allowing a reasonable defense. He’s built bases in the middle east, and fattened the bank accounts of those whose bank accounts were already obscene. The middle class — the masses — have not been so economically impotent in decades.That requires a fair amount of thought.
For such an idiot, this guy has been awfully successful.
The reason, at least in my mind, is that science is never unanimous. Consensus itself is a meaningless concept in science. Even a crank can be right, if his predictions come true. Science depends on the concept of testability, which in my mind makes it the most special system of knowledge ever devised. It is good that science is conservative, and it is good that it is slow, because both these things contribute to claims being tested properly.Read the whole thing -- not to be ashamed for assuming so much too soon. but to learn how to have true patience.
Thursday, April 12, 2007You say ...
Me too.
Matt Yglesias:
"If I had a choice between leading in national polls (Clinton), leading in fundraising (Obama), or leading in Iowa (Edwards) I'd take leading in Iowa."
I'm not sure it means as much as he seems to think - not yet, anyway - but yeah, me too.
Was Anne Hutchinson arraignedswing.
for contravening dogma?
or because she was a woman
who claimed to speak with God?